# Desmos is doing great (Another crash)

**URL:** <https://cl.desmos.com/t/desmos-is-doing-great-another-crash/8565>\
**Category:** Examples\
**Created:** [February 5, 2026, 1:05pm UTC](https://cl.desmos.com/t/desmos-is-doing-great-another-crash/8565 "2026-02-05T13:05:34Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 6

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![NTMDev](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex031/user_avatar/cl.desmos.com/ntmdev/32/7141_2.png) [@NTMDev](https://cl.desmos.com/u/NTMDev)\
**Post date:** [February 13, 2026, 6:51pm UTC](https://cl.desmos.com/t/desmos-is-doing-great-another-crash/8565/6 "2026-02-13T18:51:49Z")

</div>

Wow! Good job, I didn’t think know that (maybe its also because i’m only 13). I would understand that the Demsos engineers didn’t prioritize the rendering in the Geometry calculator but more on the functions, whereas they focused a lot on line plotting in the graphing calculator, but I still found a [bug with objects.](https://cl.desmos.com/t/yet-another-desmos-bug-crash/8547/22)

---

_[View the full topic](https://cl.desmos.com/t/desmos-is-doing-great-another-crash/8565)._
